Introverts prefer to be alone and to think through their thoughts privately rather than speak them aloud with a friend. Introverts also tend to be sensitive, and can become exhausted by social interactions. Sensing individuals rely on their five senses to relate to the world. They're practical, logical and detail-oriented. If they can't smell it, see it, feel it, taste it, or touch it, they have no natural resources to understand it.
Intuitive individuals think outside of the box and rely on their gut feelings to interact with the world. They're typically less organized and less interested in the facts. They might not know why they feel a certain way, but be certain that their feelings are correct. People who are thought-forward are able to put their feelings aside and focus on the practical matters at hand.
They can make unemotional decisions and easily follow their rational mind. All types are equal : The goal of knowing about personality type is to understand and appreciate differences between people. As all types are equal, there is no best type. The MBTI instrument sorts for preferences and does not measure trait, ability, or character.
The MBTI tool is different from many other psychological instruments and also different from other personality tests. The best reason to choose the MBTI instrument to discover your personality type is that hundreds of studies over the past 40 years have proven the instrument to be both valid and reliable.
In other words, it measures what it says it does validity and produces the same results when given more than once reliability. When you want an accurate profile of your personality type, ask if the instrument you plan to use has been validated.
The theory of psychological type was introduced in the s by Carl G. This research is ongoing, providing users with updated and new information about psychological type and its applications. Millions of people worldwide have taken the Indicator each year since its first publication in They addressed the two related goals in the developments and application of the MBTI instrument: The identification of basic preferences of each of the four dichotomies specified or implicit in Jung's theory.
Actively sociable. Possibility focused. Novelty seeking. Driving organizer. Vision focused. Pursues improvement and achievement. Change oriented. Excitement seeking. Active organizer. Fact minded. Results oriented. But the test simply tells us whether we're "thinking" or "feeling" based on how we answered a handful of binary questions, with no room in between. Another indicator that the Myers-Briggs is inaccurate is that several different analyses have shown it's not particularly effective at predicting people's success at different jobs.
If the test gives people such inaccurate results, why do so many still put stock in it? One reason is that the flattering, vague descriptions for many of the types have huge amounts of overlap — so many people could fit into several of them. This is called the Forer effect , and is a technique long used by purveyors of astrology, fortune telling, and other sorts of pseudoscience to persuade people they have accurate information about them.
All this is why psychologists — the people who focus on understanding and analyzing human behavior — almost completely disregard the Myers-Briggs in contemporary research. Search for any prominent psychology journal for analysis of personality tests , and you'll find mentions of several different systems that have been developed in the decades since the test was introduced , but not the Myers-Briggs itself.
Apart from a few analyses finding it to be flawed, virtually no major psychology journals have published research on the test — almost all of it comes in dubious outlets like The Journal of Psychological Type , which were specifically created for this type of research. Virtually no major psychology journals have published research on the test. CPP, the company that publishes the test, has three leading psychologists on their board, but none of them have used it whatsoever in their research.
The five-factor model measures people's openness, conscientiousness, extroversion, agreeableness, and neuroticism — factors that do differ widely among people, according to actual data collected. And there's some evidence that this scheme may have some predictive power in determining people's ability to be successful at various jobs and in other situations. The Shifted Librarian.
The Myers-Briggs is useful for one thing: entertainment. There's absolutely nothing wrong with taking the test as a fun, interesting activity, like a BuzzFeed quiz.
But there is something wrong with CPP peddling the test as "reliable and valid, backed by ongoing global research and development investment. About federal agencies reportedly waste money on this test. Why would someone pay this much to administer a flawed test? Once certified, test administrators become cheerleaders of the Myers-Briggs, ensuring that use of the outdated instrument is continued. If private companies want to throw their money away on the Myers-Briggs, that's their prerogative.
But about federal agencies reportedly waste money on the test too, including the State Department and the CIA. The military in particular relies heavily on the Myers-Briggs , and the EPA has given it to about a quarter of its 17, employees. It's Thousands of professional psychologists have evaluated the century-old Myers-Briggs, found it to be inaccurate and arbitrary, and devised better systems for evaluating personality.
Let's stop using this outdated test — which has about as much scientific validity as your astrological sign — and move on to something else. Correction: This piece previously stated that the military uses the Myers-Briggs for promotions in particular, rather than using it as a general tool.
Our mission has never been more vital than it is in this moment: to empower through understanding. Financial contributions from our readers are a critical part of supporting our resource-intensive work and help us keep our journalism free for all. Please consider making a contribution to Vox today to help us keep our work free for all. Cookie banner We use cookies and other tracking technologies to improve your browsing experience on our site, show personalized content and targeted ads, analyze site traffic, and understand where our audiences come from.
By choosing I Accept , you consent to our use of cookies and other tracking technologies. Why the Myers-Briggs test is totally meaningless.
0コメント